Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-34563 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Netgear R6250 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Netgear R6250 firmware version 1.0.4.48 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) that occurs after authentication. The issue is rated 9.8 under CVSS 3.1 with a vector of AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting the potential for complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected device.
Remote attackers can trigger the overflow to achieve arbitrary code execution or denial of service. The provided EPSS values are 0.1778 currently and 0.1852 at peak, indicating moderate and relatively stable exploitation probability since disclosure.
Netgear's security advisories page and associated technical write-ups on GitHub outline vendor guidance for the R6250, including any available firmware updates or configuration changes to address the flaw. No information on observed in-the-wild exploitation is supplied.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-38618
Vulnerability Data
netgear R6250 Firmware Version 1.0.4.48 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow after authentication.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Platform-independent managed code eliminates the need for unchecked native buffer copies that are the root cause of classic buffer overflows.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.