CVE-2023-45128

Security testing and developer training directly verify and enforce proper input validation, reducing exploitability of injection and malformed-data weaknesses.

Awareness training educates users on avoiding untrusted links and actions that can be exploited via CSRF.

Requiring user re-entry of credentials for sensitive actions prevents automated forgery of requests without active user participation.

Prevents reliance on untrusted matching results for security-relevant decisions by enforcing verification and contest procedures.

Security testing and evaluation at multiple SDLC stages directly detects missing or flawed input validation, with the required remediation process ensuring fixes are applied.

Providing authoritative attributes with the data reduces the need for security decisions to rely on untrusted external inputs.

Directly implements checks on information inputs to reject invalid data before processing.

Detects anomalous request patterns consistent with cross-site request forgery.

Proper management of identities/credentials reduces the chance that security decisions will be driven by untrusted inputs.

Enforcing access policy and least privilege limits damage from cookie misuse but does not address cookie validation itself.

Monitoring can detect exploitation but does not stop the underlying weakness.

By denying access to phishing or malicious sites, the control lowers the likelihood that a user will be tricked into submitting a forged request that performs an unintended action on another site.

Secure-coding guidelines and mandatory security testing (including code scans) compel developers to validate and sanitize inputs at design and implementation time, lowering the incidence of malformed or malicious data reaching downstream components.

Mandating input controls that include integrity checks and input validation ensures that untrusted data is examined before use, blocking the root cause of many injection and malformed-data weaknesses.