Security Resilience

CVE-2023-46805

Auth Bypass in Ivanti Connect Secure 22.1 … 9.1

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCRansomware-linkedAuth Bypass
Published
12 January 2024
Modified
01 October 2026
KEV Added
10 January 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.99 100.0th percentile
Risk Priority 87 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-46805 is a high-severity Improper Authentication (CWE-287) vulnerability in Ivanti Connect Secure. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 0.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) and IA-3 (Device Identification and Authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

An authentication bypass vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-46805 affects the web component of Ivanti Connect Secure (ICS) versions 9.x and 22.x as well as Ivanti Policy Secure. The flaw, assigned CWE-287, permits a remote attacker to circumvent authentication control checks and reach otherwise restricted resources. It carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 with network attack vector, low complexity, and no required credentials or user interaction.

A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit the issue over the network to obtain unauthorized access to protected areas of the affected gateways. Public references link the bypass to subsequent command-injection activity under the related CVE-2024-21887, enabling escalation to unauthenticated remote code execution on the appliance.

Ivanti advisory information and the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog list the affected products and direct administrators to apply vendor-supplied patches. The current EPSS score of 0.9437 with a recorded peak of 0.9667 indicates sustained high exploitation interest following disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An authentication bypass vulnerability in the web component of Ivanti ICS 9.x, 22.x and Ivanti Policy Secure allows a remote attacker to access restricted resources by bypassing control checks.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
10 January 2024

Related Threats

Threat-Actor AttributionAI

UNC5291
Mandiant attributed in-the-wild exploitation of the Ivanti Connect Secure auth-bypass CVE-2023-46805 (with CVE-2024-21887) to UNC5291 in Jan 2024 reporting.
Cutting Edge (C0029)
Threat Actors Exploit Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure Gateways | CISA
Intel Corp. (Micron 2018-2020 NAND civil counter-claims)
Threat Actors Exploit Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure Gateways | CISA
AnonOps
Threat Actors Exploit Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure Gateways | CISA
UTA0178
Threat Actors Exploit Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure Gateways | CISA
Amazon.com (Walmart logistics engineer recruitment civil claims)
Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System | CISA
CrowdStrike (McAfee / Symantec civil claims)
Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System | CISA
Google LLC (civil insider-recruitment defendant)
Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System | CISA
Microsoft Corp. (Salesforce / Slack engineer recruitment claims)
Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System | CISA
Nokia (Huawei engineer-recruitment dispute 2007)
Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System | CISA
Salt Typhoon (G1045)
Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System | CISA

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-21887Same product: Ivanti Connect Secureboth on KEV
CVE-2020-8243Same product: Ivanti Connect Secureboth on KEV
CVE-2021-22893Same product: Ivanti Connect Secureboth on KEV
CVE-2024-21893Same product: Ivanti Connect Secureboth on KEV
CVE-2025-22457Same product: Ivanti Connect Secureboth on KEV
CVE-2025-0282Same product: Ivanti Connect Secureboth on KEV
CVE-2024-37401Same product: Ivanti Connect Secure
CVE-2024-13830Same product: Ivanti Connect Secure
CVE-2024-39711Same product: Ivanti Connect Secure
CVE-2024-8495Same product: Ivanti Connect Secure

Affected Assets

ivanti
connect secure
22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5
ivanti
policy secure
22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Mandates unique identification and authentication of organizational users before access, directly stopping improper authentication.

Requires unique identification and authentication of devices before establishing connections, preventing unauthenticated device claims.

Mandates unique identification and authentication of non-organizational users, directly addressing the weakness for external actors.

Manages authenticators with verification and secure distribution, reducing opportunities for improper authentication.

Enforces access only after approved authorizations, which presupposes correct authentication has occurred.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Mandating segregated approval and oversight for non-human identities reduces the chance that weak or orphaned credentials can be exploited for unauthorized authentication.

blocks

A.5.17 directly mandates generation of non-guessable unique secrets, secure transmission, immediate change of defaults/temporary creds, strong password enforcement, no-reuse, and compromise response, which stops most improper-authentication exploits at source; the bounded remainder is non-password authentication methods and sufficiency-of-proof cases (e.g. IA-2/IA-5 enhancements) left to other controls.

blocks

Security requirements specified early and verified through testing drive the consistent implementation of authentication mechanisms, decreasing the likelihood that authentication steps are omitted or incorrectly applied.

blocks

A.8.26 explicitly requires identifying and addressing authentication-related requirements (including level of trust in identity via 8.5 and 5.17) as part of application development or acquisition, which prevents a slice of CWE-287 but leaves the dominant sufficiency-of-proof aspects (IA-2/IA-5) and many implementation defects untouched.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (least privilege, default-deny, never-trust/always-verify, MFA, end-to-end encryption of requests, distrust-external-input, secure session control, and explicit authentication/authorization in every layer), which directly stops most improper-authentication flaws from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is insufficient-proof cases that live only in the strength or correctness of the credential itself (IA-5/IA-2 territory).

blocks

A.8.5 directly mandates appropriate-strength authentication techniques, MFA for critical systems, protected log-on procedures, brute-force resistance, no cleartext passwords/transmission, and session controls that stop exploitation of insufficient proof of identity; the bounded remainder is cases where the chosen technique itself is flawed or insufficiently implemented (e.g. weak biometrics without fallback).

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-287, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-295, CWE-306.

References