Security Resilience

CVE-2023-5165

Access Control in Docker Desktop 4.13.0 – 4.23.0

Published
25 September 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0033 24th percentile
Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-5165 is a high-severity Improper Protection of Alternate Path (CWE-424) vulnerability in Docker Docker Desktop. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 24th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Docker Desktop before 4.23.0 allows an unprivileged user to bypass Enhanced Container Isolation (ECI) restrictions via the debug shell which remains accessible for a short time window after launching Docker Desktop. The affected functionality is available for Docker Business customers…

more

only and assumes an environment where users are not granted local root or Administrator privileges. This issue has been fixed in Docker Desktop 4.23.0. Affected Docker Desktop versions: from 4.13.0 before 4.23.0.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-32081Shared CWE-862
CVE-2025-24633Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-38721Shared CWE-862
CVE-2023-21133Shared CWE-862
CVE-2025-53291Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-56066Shared CWE-862
CVE-2023-1337Shared CWE-862
CVE-2025-23190Shared CWE-862
CVE-2023-46195Shared CWE-862
CVE-2023-32593Shared CWE-862

Affected Assets

docker
docker desktop
4.13.0 — 4.23.0

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-424 CWE-862

Documenting requirements and authorizing remote access ensures proper protection of alternate paths.

addresses: CWE-862

Requiring an access control policy ensures authorization checks are defined and applied for critical functions.

addresses: CWE-862

Reviews of access controls detect missing authorization checks on critical functions or resources.

addresses: CWE-862

Documenting permitted unauthenticated actions prevents missing authorization by making all exceptions explicit and subject to organizational review.

addresses: CWE-862

Requiring attribute association with information prevents authorization from being performed without necessary security or privacy context.

addresses: CWE-862

Mandating authorization before wireless connections are allowed prevents missing authorization for wireless access.

addresses: CWE-862

The control requires authorization before allowing mobile device connections, directly mitigating missing authorization for system access.

addresses: CWE-862

Requiring approvals for account creation and specifying authorizations ensures authorization is not missing for system access.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Access control policy directly requires protection of all entry points to restricted functionality.

blocks

Managing access rights must cover every alternate path that could bypass intended restrictions.

finds

By requiring competent outsiders to verify that every function enforces the need-to-know principle, the control lowers the likelihood that missing authorization checks persist undetected.

blocks

A.5.8 integrates risk assessment, requirements elicitation and governance into the project lifecycle so that authorization needs can be identified and specified; it does not itself perform or enforce authorization checks, so the missing-authorization weakness can still be present and exploitable.

blocks

Privileged access rights must be enforced on every possible route to privileged functions.

blocks

Secure development lifecycle includes design reviews that should identify and close alternate paths.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-424, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.
  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-862, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References