Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-6018 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Lfprojects Mlflow. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Other AI Platforms; in the Supply Chain and Deployment risk domain.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2023-6018 is an unauthenticated file overwrite vulnerability affecting the MLflow machine learning platform. The flaw, assigned CWE-78, permits remote attackers to replace arbitrary files on the host server and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 reflecting network-accessible, low-complexity exploitation with no required credentials or user interaction.
An attacker can send crafted requests directly to a publicly reachable MLflow instance and overwrite any file on the underlying server filesystem. Successful exploitation grants full control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MLflow deployment and any data or models it manages.
The current EPSS score of 0.9127, with a recorded peak of 0.9265, indicates sustained and elevated exploitation interest since disclosure. The issue is particularly relevant to AI/ML environments that rely on MLflow for experiment tracking and model management.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-2888
Vulnerability Data
An attacker can overwrite any file on the server hosting MLflow without any authentication.
- CWE(s)
AI Security AnalysisAI
- AI Category
- Other AI Platforms
- Risk Domain
- Supply Chain and Deployment
- OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
- None mapped
- Classification Reason
- MLflow is an open-source platform for managing the machine learning lifecycle, including experimentation, reproducibility, and deployment, fitting under 'Other Platforms' as it is not a framework, library, or specific AI sub-domain tool.
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8V15.2.5
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.