CVE-2024-0840
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-0840 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization of Parameter/Argument Delimiters (CWE-141) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique NTDS (T1003.003); ranked in the top 42% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-16623
Vulnerability Data
The Grandstream UCM Series IP PBX before firmware version 1.0.20.52 is affected by a parameter injection vulnerability in the HTTP interface. A remote and authenticated attacker can execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted HTTP request. Authentication may be possible…
more
using a default user and password. Affected models are the UCM6202, UCM6204, UCM6208, and UCM6510.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Input validation directly requires checking and neutralizing delimiter characters in received data before forwarding to downstream components.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization to prevent delimiter injection.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reach improper neutralization of delimiters, but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. incomplete implementation of guidelines, outsourced development without full assurance, or non-code injection vectors).
A.8.26 explicitly lists resilience against SQL injections (and similar) as an application security requirement to be identified/addressed in development or acquisition, which stops exploitation of delimiter mishandling for a bounded minority slice of CWE-141 instances; most instances arise from missing neutralization in custom code or libraries outside the requirements process.
Secure system architecture principles encourage safe interfaces but do not prescribe delimiter neutralization.