Security Resilience

CVE-2024-11024

Apppresser ≤ 4.4.7

Published
26 November 2024
Modified
05 June 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0070 52th percentile
Risk Priority 72 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-11024 is a critical-severity Improper Handling of Missing Values (CWE-230) vulnerability in Apppresser Apppresser. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The AppPresser – Mobile App Framework plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via account takeover in all versions up to, and including, 4.4.6. This is due to the plugin not properly validating a user's password reset code prior…

more

to updating their password. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, with knowledge of a user's email address, to reset the user's password and gain access to their account.

CWE(s)
CWE-230

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.001 Junk Data Command And Control
Adversaries may add junk data to protocols used for command and control to make detection more difficult.
attack.mitre.org →
T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
attack.mitre.org →
T1003.007 Proc Filesystem Credential Access
Adversaries may gather credentials from the proc filesystem or `/proc`.
attack.mitre.org →
T1006 Direct Volume Access Stealth
Adversaries may directly access a volume to bypass file access controls and file system monitoring.
attack.mitre.org →
T1007 System Service Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services.
attack.mitre.org →
T1011 Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium Exfiltration
Adversaries may attempt to exfiltrate data over a different network medium than the command and control channel.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-4214Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2024-31374Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2024-31268Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2025-1561Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2024-9305Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2024-32776Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2024-4611Same product: Apppresser Apppresser
CVE-2024-6237Shared CWE-230
CVE-2026-25659Shared CWE-230
CVE-2024-9781Shared CWE-230

Affected Assets

apppresser
apppresser
≤ 4.4.7

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 7 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly requires checking that supplied parameters/fields have valid (non-missing) values before they are used.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and null/missing-value handling during coding and review.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems partial match
removes
A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
blocks

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including input validation per item j) be identified and specified during development or acquisition; it does not itself enforce, implement or assure correct handling of missing values, so the weakness can still be present and exploitable.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
removes
A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards can require validation that every supplied parameter has a non-null value.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance partial match
finds

Security testing can detect missing-value flaws but does not itself prevent them.

A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities partial match
removes

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (4 rules)
  • V-248714 OL 8 must not allow accounts configured with blank or null passwords. blocks CWE-230
  • V-248715 OL 8 must not allow blank or null passwords in the system-auth file. blocks CWE-230
  • V-248716 OL 8 must not allow blank or null passwords in the password-auth file. blocks CWE-230
RHEL 7 (1 rule)
  • V-204424 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must not allow accounts configured with blank or null passwords. blocks CWE-230
Ubuntu 24.04 (1 rule)
  • V-270714 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS must not allow accounts configured in Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) with blank or null passwords. blocks CWE-230

References