CVE-2024-20329
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software 9.17.1 … 9.19.1.9
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-20329 is a critical-severity Improper Neutralization of Expression/Command Delimiters (CWE-146) vulnerability in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software. Its CVSS base score is 9.9 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked in the top 34% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-18044
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability in the SSH subsystem of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute operating system commands as root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input. An attacker could exploit…
more
this vulnerability by submitting crafted input when executing remote CLI commands over SSH. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands on the underlying operating system with root-level privileges. An attacker with limited user privileges could use this vulnerability to gain complete control over the system.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Input validation directly stops unneutralized expression/command delimiters from reaching downstream components.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization to prevent delimiter/command injection.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reach improper neutralization of delimiters, but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. inconsistent application across outsourced development, incomplete coverage of all languages/environments, or post-SDLC changes).
A.8.26 explicitly calls out the need to identify and address requirements for resilience against SQL injections and similar attacks (item d), plus input validation (j) and related controls, which when specified and met stop exploitation of command/expression delimiter issues; this covers only the requirements-identification slice of CWE-146, not the actual implementation or completeness of neutralization in code.
Secure architecture principles reduce attack surface but do not prescribe delimiter neutralization.
Secure coding standards require proper neutralization of special elements, directly eliminating this weakness.
Security testing can detect the weakness but does not prevent it by itself.