Security Resilience

CVE-2024-21412

Microsoft Windows 10 1809 ≤ 10.0.17763.5458

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedRansomware-linked
Published
13 February 2024
Modified
10 August 2026
KEV Added
13 February 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.99 99.9th percentile
Risk Priority 86 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-21412 is a high-severity Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 10 1809. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 0.1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-21412 is a security feature bypass vulnerability affecting the handling of Internet Shortcut Files. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 and is associated with CWE-693. It was publicly disclosed on 13 February 2024 and impacts components responsible for processing .url files within Microsoft environments.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the issue by supplying a malicious Internet Shortcut File over the network. Successful exploitation requires the victim to interact with the file, after which the bypass allows high-impact effects on confidentiality and integrity while leaving availability unaffected.

Microsoft’s advisory at msrc.microsoft.com details the available patches and configuration guidance, while CISA has added the CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, confirming active exploitation in the wild. The associated EPSS score remains consistently high, with a current value of 0.9377 and a peak of 0.9378.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Internet Shortcut Files Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
13 February 2024

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-29988Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2024-38213Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2024-38217Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2023-36033Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2024-21338Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2024-28920Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2026-21510Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2026-21513Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2026-32202Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809both on KEV
CVE-2024-43585Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809

Affected Assets

microsoft
windows 10 1809
≤ 10.0.17763.5458
microsoft
windows 10 21h2
≤ 10.0.19044.4046
microsoft
windows 10 22h2
≤ 10.0.19045.4046
microsoft
windows 11 21h2
≤ 10.0.22000.2777
microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.3155
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.3155
microsoft
windows server 2019
≤ 10.0.17763.5458
microsoft
windows server 2022
≤ 10.0.20348.2322
microsoft
windows server 2022 23h2
≤ 10.0.25398.709

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-3 directly requires enforcement of access authorizations via the protection mechanism itself.

AC-4 mandates use of information flow enforcement mechanisms to control data movement.

SC-2 requires separation of user and system functionality as a protection mechanism.

SC-28 requires protection mechanisms for information at rest.

SC-3 requires isolation of security functions from non-security functions.

SC-7 requires boundary protection mechanisms to monitor and control external communications.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Systematic verification that security mechanisms operate according to defined standards reduces the likelihood that protection mechanisms are bypassed or disabled.

removes

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including protection mechanisms) be identified and specified during development or acquisition; it does not itself mandate, implement, or enforce the mechanisms that would remove CWE-693 instances from the product.

removes

A.8.28 mandates secure coding practices, principles, standards, design, peer review, defect removal, prohibition of insecure techniques (e.g. hard-coded passwords), and evaluation of common errors before deployment, which directly removes many instances of missing or incorrectly used protection mechanisms from first-party code; the bounded remainder is third-party components and post-deployment issues handled by other clauses (8.8, 8.29).

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-693, a pillar-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-654, CWE-757.

References