Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-2360

Path Traversal in Lollms Web Ui

Public PoCPath Traversal
Published
06 June 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.019 77th percentile
Risk Priority 80 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-2360 is a critical-severity Path Traversal: '\..\filename' (CWE-29) vulnerability in Lollms Lollms Web Ui. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 23% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as LLM Application Platforms; in the Other ATLAS/OWASP Terms risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

parisneo/lollms-webui is affected by a path traversal vulnerability that can result in remote code execution. The issue stems from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input in the Database path and PDF LaTeX path settings, specifically the discussion_db_name and pdf_latex_path parameters, which fail to validate file paths and permit directory traversal in the latest version of the software. The flaw is tracked under CWE-22 and CWE-29 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8.

An unauthenticated attacker with network access can supply crafted values for these parameters to traverse directories, execute arbitrary code on the server, and potentially expose additional files or enable further attack chains.

The associated EPSS score rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0971, indicating that exploitation interest increased after disclosure. Details of the issue are documented in the referenced huntr.com bounty reports.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

parisneo/lollms-webui is vulnerable to path traversal attacks that can lead to remote code execution due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input in the 'Database path' and 'PDF LaTeX path' settings. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating these settings…

more

to execute arbitrary code on the targeted server. The issue affects the latest version of the software. The vulnerability stems from the application's handling of the 'discussion_db_name' and 'pdf_latex_path' parameters, which do not properly validate file paths, allowing for directory traversal. This vulnerability can also lead to further file exposure and other attack vectors by manipulating the 'discussion_db_name' parameter.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
LLM Application Platforms
Risk Domain
Other ATLAS/OWASP Terms
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
parisneo/lollms-webui is a web user interface for managing and running large language models (LLMs), fitting as an other AI platform rather than a framework, library, or specific tool category.

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
T1083 File and Directory Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may enumerate files and directories or may search in specific locations of a host or network share for certain information within a file system.
T1552 Unsecured Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may search compromised systems to find and obtain insecurely stored credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-4320Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-2624Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-1873Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-3322Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-1511Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-4498Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-2548Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-8898Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-8581Same product: Lollms Lollms Web Ui
CVE-2024-3429Same vendor: Lollms

Affected Assets

lollms
lollms web ui
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Input validation directly neutralizes the '\..\filename' sequence before pathname resolution occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that block this traversal vector.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can discover path-traversal flaws but does not itself prevent them in production code.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate input validation and path canonicalization to block traversal sequences.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include directory sandboxing and safe file-access design that mitigate path traversal.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require neutralizing path traversal sequences such as '\..\filename'.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References