Security Resilience

CVE-2024-23684

DoS in Peteroupc Cbor 4.0.0 – 4.5.1

Public PoCDoS
Published
19 January 2024
Modified
14 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0092 60th percentile
Risk Priority 61 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-23684 is a high-severity Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity (CWE-407) vulnerability in Peteroupc Cbor. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 40% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Inefficient algorithmic complexity in DecodeFromBytes function in com.upokecenter.cbor Java implementation of Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) versions 4.0.0 to 4.5.1 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by passing a maliciously crafted input. Depending on an application's use…

more

of this library, this may be a remote attacker.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-21909Same product: Peteroupc Cbor
CVE-2025-27209Shared CWE-407
CVE-2023-4408Shared CWE-407
CVE-2025-29908Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-31932Shared CWE-407
CVE-2024-12243Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-58226Shared CWE-407
CVE-2024-43483Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-86435Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-69651Shared CWE-407

Affected Assets

peteroupc
cbor
4.0.0 — 4.5.1

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Denial-of-service protection directly reduces the impact of resource exhaustion triggered by worst-case algorithmic inputs.

Resource availability allocation limits blast radius when an inefficient algorithm is forced into its worst case.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Redundancy of processing facilities can absorb resource exhaustion from inefficient algorithms.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify anomalous resource consumption indicative of algorithmic complexity attacks.

blocks

Secure development life cycle includes design reviews that can catch inefficient algorithms before deployment.

blocks

Secure system architecture principles encourage selection of algorithms with acceptable worst-case complexity.

prevents

Secure coding practices can include guidelines to avoid or mitigate inefficient algorithms.

finds

Security testing can uncover performance issues stemming from algorithmic complexity.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-407, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References