Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-32104 is a medium-severity CSRF (CWE-352) vulnerability in Xlplugins Nextmove. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Security Account Manager (T1003.002); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
The vulnerability CVE-2024-32104 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) flaw, tracked as CWE-352, in the XLPlugins NextMove Lite WordPress plugin. It affects all versions through 2.18.1 and received a CVSS v3.1 score of 4.3, reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, no required privileges, and required user interaction that results in limited integrity impact without affecting confidentiality or availability.
An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the issue by crafting a malicious request that an authenticated user is tricked into submitting, enabling unauthorized actions such as configuration changes within the affected plugin instance.
Public advisories published via Patchstack document the vulnerability in the woo-thank-you-page-nextmove-lite component and point to available remediation steps for the affected plugin versions. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.1513 with no material increase observed since disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-29926
Vulnerability Data
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in XLPlugins NextMove Lite.This issue affects NextMove Lite: from n/a through 2.18.1.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V3.3.2V3.5.1V10.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Access enforcement requires verifying that state-changing requests originate from the authenticated user rather than a forged cross-site source.
Protecting session authenticity prevents attackers from replaying or forging authenticated requests via the victim's browser.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require anti-CSRF controls such as tokens or SameSite attributes.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.