Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-34750

DoS in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0 – 9.0.90

Published
03 July 2024
Modified
03 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.046 91th percentile
Risk Priority 70 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-34750 is a high-severity Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique OS Exhaustion Flood (T1499.001); ranked in the top 9% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-24 (Fail in Known State) and SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-34750 is an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Apache Tomcat stemming from improper handling of exceptional conditions during HTTP/2 stream processing. Affected versions fail to correctly manage cases involving excessive HTTP headers, resulting in miscounting of active streams and application of an infinite timeout that leaves connections open when they should be terminated. The issue impacts Tomcat releases 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M20, 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.24, and 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.89, as well as earlier end-of-life branches including 8.5.0 through 8.5.100.

Remote attackers without authentication can exploit the flaw by sending crafted HTTP/2 requests containing large numbers of headers. Successful exploitation produces a denial-of-service condition by exhausting server resources through persistent open connections, consistent with the CVSS 7.5 rating that emphasizes high availability impact over confidentiality or integrity.

Apache Tomcat project advisories direct users to upgrade immediately to the patched releases 11.0.0-M21, 10.1.25, or 9.0.90. Corresponding notices from distributors such as Debian and NetApp reiterate the same remediation steps and reference the original Apache announcement for further details.

EPSS scores have remained essentially flat near 0.22 with no material post-disclosure climb.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. When processing an HTTP/2 stream, Tomcat did not handle some cases of excessive HTTP headers correctly. This led to a miscounting of active HTTP/2 streams which in turn…

more

led to the use of an incorrect infinite timeout which allowed connections to remain open which should have been closed. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M20, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.24, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.89. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 though 8.5.100. Other EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M21, 10.1.25 or 9.0.90, which fixes the issue.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499.001 OS Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may launch a denial of service (DoS) attack targeting an endpoint's operating system (OS).
T1498 Network Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Network Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of targeted resources to users.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.002 Service Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target the different network services provided by systems to conduct a denial of service (DoS).
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-38286Same product: Apache Tomcat
CVE-2024-54677Same product: Apache Tomcat
CVE-2024-47554Same product: Netapp Ontap Tools
CVE-2025-27820Same product: Netapp Ontap Tools
CVE-2024-39884Same product: Netapp Ontap Tools
CVE-2024-50379Same product: Apache Tomcat
CVE-2024-28752Same product: Netapp Ontap Tools
CVE-2024-56337Same product: Apache Tomcat
CVE-2023-27314Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2024-38477Same product class: NAS / storage appliance

Affected Assets

apache
tomcat
11.0.0 · 9.0.0 — 9.0.90 · 10.1.0 — 10.1.25
netapp
ontap tools
9

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Requires the system to fail to a known safe state on specified failures, limiting the impact of unhandled exceptional conditions.

SC-5 directly limits the effects of resource-exhaustion events that constitute uncontrolled consumption.

SC-6 enforces explicit allocation limits on resources, structurally preventing the weakness from occurring.

Mandates explicit fail-safe procedures triggered by indicated failures, structurally preventing unhandled or mishandled exceptional conditions.

Process isolation confines resource consumption to separate domains, reducing blast radius without stopping the root flaw.

Requires generation of appropriate error messages on exceptional conditions, directly enforcing correct handling rather than silent or incorrect behavior.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.IR-04 mostly match
prevents

Explicitly requires monitoring and maintaining resource capacity, directly addressing uncontrolled consumption to preserve availability.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices explicitly require proper exception and error handling during design and coding.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Continuous monitoring of computing resources can detect resource exhaustion but does not itself enforce allocation limits.

PR.IR-03 partial match
prevents

Resilience mechanisms such as avoiding single points of failure indirectly reduce impact of resource exhaustion.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines can include resource quotas and limits that constrain consumption.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Resource-utilization monitoring and alerting on bottlenecks or overloads limits the impact of denial-of-service or resource-exhaustion attacks.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance verifies correct handling of exceptional conditions.

prevents

By continuously monitoring utilization, stress-testing peak loads, and maintaining documented plans to scale or throttle resources, the control directly limits an attacker’s ability to drive a system into uncontrolled resource exhaustion.

finds

Pre-agreed severity-based prioritization and resource allocation during incident triage reduce the likelihood that an attacker-induced resource exhaustion will overwhelm the organization before corrective action is taken.

mitigates

Business-continuity plans that include resource-management controls reduce the likelihood that an attacker can trigger uncontrolled resource consumption by forcing the system into a degraded or fallback state.

mitigates

Defining RTOs and capacity requirements for ICT services during business-impact analysis forces organizations to provision sufficient resources and throttling mechanisms, reducing the likelihood that an attacker can induce denial-of-service through uncontrolled resource consumption.

References