CVE-2024-36420
Flowiseai Flowise 1.4.3
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-36420 is a high-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Flowiseai Flowise. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 24% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as LLM Application Platforms; in the Privacy and Disclosure risk domain.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Flowise version 1.4.3, a drag-and-drop interface for constructing customized large language model flows, is affected by an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the /api/v1/openai-assistants-file endpoint. The flaw resides in packages/server/src/index.ts and stems from missing sanitization of the fileName body parameter, corresponding to CWE-74 and carrying a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 for unauthenticated network access that impacts confidentiality.
Remote attackers without credentials can submit crafted POST requests to the endpoint and retrieve arbitrary files from the underlying server filesystem, exposing sensitive configuration or data. The attack requires no user interaction and can be performed directly over the network.
Public references, including the GitHub Security Lab advisory GHSL-2023-232 and the affected source lines, document the injection vector, while the vulnerability record states that no patches are available. The associated EPSS score of 0.5832 reflects sustained exploitation interest for this LLM-related component.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-2594
Vulnerability Data
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In version 1.4.3 of Flowise, the `/api/v1/openai-assistants-file` endpoint in `index.ts` is vulnerable to arbitrary file read due to lack of sanitization of the `fileName`…
more
body parameter. No known patches for this issue are available.
- CWE(s)
AI Security AnalysisAI
- AI Category
- LLM Application Platforms
- Risk Domain
- Privacy and Disclosure
- OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
- None mapped
- Classification Reason
- Flowise is a drag-and-drop user interface for building customized large language model (LLM) flows, specifically integrating with OpenAI Assistants (e.g., /api/v1/openai-assistants-file endpoint), fitting the Enterprise AI Assistants category as a platform for developing and deploying LLM-based assistants.
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.1V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.
Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.
Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.
Secure architecture principles reduce injection surfaces but do not prescribe specific neutralization techniques.