Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-39355

Published
12 February 2025
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 5.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0024 15th percentile
Risk Priority 27 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-39355 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Physical or Environmental Conditions (CWE-1384) vulnerability in Intel (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 5.7 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 15th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CP-12 (Safe Mode) and PE-13 (Fire Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper handling of physical or environmental conditions in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to enable denial of service via local access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-2759Shared CWE-1384
CVE-2025-52557Shared CWE-1384
CVE-2026-2760Shared CWE-1384
CVE-2026-2757Shared CWE-1384
CVE-2026-49325Shared CWE-1384

Affected Assets

Intel
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

EMP protection directly addresses an artificially induced physical/environmental threat.

Safe-mode entry on detected adverse conditions reduces impact without eliminating the root handling weakness.

Fire detection and suppression directly stops fire (an environmental condition) from damaging the system.

Maintaining temperature and humidity levels prevents environmental conditions from affecting system operation.

Isolation valves and shutoffs stop water damage (environmental condition) from reaching the system.

Known-state failure on component or environmental faults limits blast radius.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.IR-02 full match
prevents

Explicit protection of assets from environmental threats is the core mitigation for improper handling of those conditions.

DE.CM-02 mostly match
prevents

Monitoring the physical environment directly surfaces the conditions the weakness fails to handle.

PR.IR-03 partial match
prevents

Resilience mechanisms help withstand adverse environmental situations but do not specifically address detection or handling of the conditions themselves.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Directly requires protection against physical and environmental threats that the weakness describes.

prevents

Ensures supporting utilities (power, HVAC) are protected, mitigating environmental-condition failures.

finds

Physical security monitoring can detect environmental anomalies or tampering.

mitigates

Ensures information security is maintained during physical or environmental disruptions.

mitigates

ICT readiness for business continuity includes resilience to environmental conditions.

mitigates

Physical perimeters reduce exposure to external environmental threats.

References