CVE-2024-41473
RCE in Tendacn Fh1201 Firmware 1.2.0.14
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-41473 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Tendacn Fh1201 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Tenda FH1201 version 1.2.0.14 contains a command injection vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-41473 and assigned CWE-78, in the mac parameter processed by the ip/goform/WriteFacMac endpoint. The flaw received a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8, driven by its network attack vector, lack of required authentication or user interaction, and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Unauthenticated remote attackers can supply crafted input to the affected endpoint and execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the router. This grants complete device compromise, enabling actions such as configuration changes, traffic interception, or persistence mechanisms.
The two referenced GitHub repositories document the vulnerability through proof-of-concept details but contain no vendor advisories, firmware patches, or mitigation steps.
The CVE maintains a high EPSS score, recorded at 0.8630 currently with a peak of 0.8798.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-39058
Vulnerability Data
Tenda FH1201 v1.2.0.14 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the mac parameter at ip/goform/WriteFacMac
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8V15.2.5
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.
Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.
Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.
Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.
Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.