Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-50707

RCE in Uniguest Tripleplay ≤ 24.1.2

Published
04 March 2025
Modified
28 May 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0081 54th percentile
Risk Priority 84 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-50707 is a critical-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Uniguest Tripleplay. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-50707 is an unauthenticated remote code execution flaw affecting Uniguest Tripleplay software prior to version 24.2.1. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of the X-Forwarded-For header in incoming HTTP GET requests and is tracked under CWE-94, with a maximum CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0 reflecting network-accessible, low-complexity exploitation that can impact confidentiality, integrity Availability across scope boundaries.

Remote, unauthenticated attackers can supply a malicious X-Forwarded-For header to trigger arbitrary code execution on the target system, enabling full compromise without any user interaction or credentials.

Vendor advisories and a detailed summary are published at uniguest.com/cve-bulletins/ and in the PDF at uniguest.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CVE-2024-50707-Vulnerability-Summary.pdf, indicating that the issue is resolved in release 24.2.1. The associated EPSS score rose from lower values after disclosure to a peak of 0.1219 on 2026-04-18 before receding to the current 0.0675, indicating a period of increased exploitation interest that later subsided.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Uniguest Tripleplay before 24.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the X-Forwarded-For header in an HTTP GET request.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.002 AppleScript Execution
Adversaries may abuse AppleScript for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.005 Visual Basic Execution
Adversaries may abuse Visual Basic (VB) for execution.
T1059.006 Python Execution
Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-50704Same product: Uniguest Tripleplay
CVE-2023-25759Same product: Uniguest Tripleplay
CVE-2024-50706Same product: Uniguest Tripleplay
CVE-2024-50705Same product: Uniguest Tripleplay
CVE-2023-26599Same product: Uniguest Tripleplay
CVE-2023-25760Same product: Uniguest Tripleplay
CVE-2023-25910Shared CWE-94
CVE-2026-42214Shared CWE-94
CVE-2023-51026Shared CWE-94
CVE-2025-42895Shared CWE-94

Affected Assets

uniguest
tripleplay
24.2 · ≤ 24.1.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.

Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.

Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.DS-10 none match
prevents

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.

References