Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-53703

Memory Safety in Sonicwall Sma 200 Firmware ≤ 10.2.1.14-75sv

Published
05 December 2024
Modified
04 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.13 96th percentile
Risk Priority 75 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-53703 is a high-severity Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121) vulnerability in Sonicwall Sma 200 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2024-53703 exists in the mod_httprp library loaded by the Apache web server on SonicWall SMA100 SSLVPN firmware versions 10.2.1.13-72sv and earlier. The flaw is a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) that received a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 reflecting network attack vector, high complexity, and no requirements for privileges or user interaction.

Remote unauthenticated attackers can trigger the overflow to achieve arbitrary code execution with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The current and peak EPSS score of 0.2915 indicates sustained exploitation interest since disclosure.

The vendor advisory at https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0018 addresses the issue for affected SMA100 appliances.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in the SonicWall SMA100 SSLVPN firmware 10.2.1.13-72sv and earlier versions mod_httprp library loaded by the Apache web server allows remote attackers to cause Stack-based buffer overflow and potentially lead to code execution.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-45318Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2021-20038Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2025-40596Same product: Sonicwall Sma 210
CVE-2024-40763Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2025-40597Same product: Sonicwall Sma 210
CVE-2021-20039Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2023-44221Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2024-22395Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2023-5970Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200
CVE-2024-53702Same product: Sonicwall Sma 200

Affected Assets

sonicwall
sma 200 firmware
≤ 10.2.1.14-75sv
sonicwall
sma 210 firmware
≤ 10.2.1.14-75sv
sonicwall
sma 400 firmware
≤ 10.2.1.14-75sv
sonicwall
sma 410 firmware
≤ 10.2.1.14-75sv
sonicwall
sma 500v firmware
≤ 10.2.1.14-75sv

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and analysis can discover stack-buffer overflows before deployment.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from exceeding stack buffer bounds.

Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.

Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly prevent introduction of stack buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning can discover stack buffer overflows but does not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching eliminates known instances of the weakness after discovery.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing (fuzzing, static analysis) detects stack overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent stack overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify buffer-size and input-validation rules.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and least-privilege stack usage.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer handling that causes CWE-121.

none

Change-management gates can enforce security reviews that catch buffer issues.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
  • V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121

References