Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-57020

RCE in Totolink X5000R Firmware 9.1.0cu.2350_b20230313

Published
15 January 2025
Modified
18 March 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.016 74th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-57020 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Totolink X5000R Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 26% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

TOTOLINK X5000R firmware version V9.1.0cu.2350_B20230313 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the setWiFiScheduleCfg function, specifically through the sMinute parameter. The flaw is tracked as CVE-2024-57020 and is classified under CWE-78, carrying a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 that reflects network-accessible exploitation with low attack complexity and authenticated low-privileged access.

An authenticated attacker can supply a crafted sMinute value to the affected endpoint and execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the device. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the router, enabling actions such as configuration changes, traffic interception, or persistence mechanisms.

The associated EPSS score rose from lower values to a peak of 0.0695 on 2025-12-11 before receding to the current 0.0338, indicating a measurable increase in observed exploitation interest after public disclosure. Public references include a detailed proof-of-concept but no vendor advisory describing patches or configuration mitigations.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

TOTOLINK X5000R V9.1.0cu.2350_B20230313 was discovered to contain an OS command injection vulnerability via the "sMinute" parameter in setWiFiScheduleCfg.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-57012Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-57024Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-42744Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-57014Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-57017Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-42742Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2025-70329Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-42736Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-42748Same product: Totolink X5000R
CVE-2024-34921Same product: Totolink X5000R

Affected Assets

totolink
x5000r firmware
9.1.0cu.2350_b20230313

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References