CVE-2024-7409
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-7409 is a high-severity Improper Synchronization (CWE-662) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 39% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-39 (Process Isolation) and SC-4 (Information in Shared System Resources) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-48876
Vulnerability Data
A flaw was found in the QEMU NBD Server. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) attack via improper synchronization during socket closure when a client keeps a socket open as the server is taken offline.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V15.4.1V6.5.1V15.1.3V15.4.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Process isolation reduces the attack surface and blast radius of synchronization failures but does not itself implement the required synchronization.
SC-4 directly requires preventing unintended information transfer through shared resources, which is achieved only by proper synchronization primitives for exclusive access.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require synchronization mechanisms and concurrency testing to prevent race conditions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect synchronization flaws but does not itself implement the required controls.
Secure development lifecycle requires concurrency controls and synchronization primitives to prevent race conditions.
Secure system architecture principles include thread-safety and resource-locking mechanisms to avoid improper synchronization.
Secure coding standards explicitly mandate proper use of locks, semaphores, and atomic operations to eliminate race conditions.