CVE-2024-7965
Memory Safety in Google Chrome ≤ 128.0.6613.84
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-7965 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Downgrade Attack (T1689); ranked in the top 3% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2024-7965 is an inappropriate implementation flaw in the V8 JavaScript engine that affects Google Chrome versions prior to 128.0.6613.84. The issue stems from insufficient bounds checking that can lead to heap corruption when processing a specially crafted HTML page, corresponding to CWE-787 and CWE-358. It carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no required privileges.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the vulnerability by convincing a user to visit a malicious web page, after which successful exploitation may allow arbitrary code execution within the renderer process with the potential to compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the browser.
The official Chrome stable channel update released on 21 August 2024 upgrades V8 to a fixed version; administrators are advised to ensure all desktop and mobile instances are updated promptly. The vulnerability is also tracked in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, confirming active exploitation in the wild.
EPSS scores rose from low values at disclosure to a peak of 0.2753 on 23 September 2024 before receding to the current 0.2280, indicating measurable post-disclosure exploitation interest that warrants continued monitoring.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-48798
Vulnerability Data
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 128.0.6613.84 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 28 August 2024
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.2.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Input validation can structurally reject or sanitize data that would otherwise trigger an out-of-bounds write.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Use of cryptography control depends on correct implementation of standardized cryptographic checks.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.
Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.