Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-9675

Path Traversal in Redhat Openshift Container Platform 4.13 … 4.17

Published
09 October 2024
Modified
07 August 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0039 32th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-9675 is a high-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Redhat Openshift Container Platform. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in Buildah. Cache mounts do not properly validate that user-specified paths for the cache are within our cache directory, allowing a `RUN` instruction in a Container file to mount an arbitrary directory from the host (read/write)…

more

into the container as long as those files can be accessed by the user running Buildah.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-9676Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-12088Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-12087Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-1132Same product: Redhat Openshift Container Platform
CVE-2024-5154Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-4982Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-6855Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2024-51127Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-1616Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-0964Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux

Affected Assets

buildah project
buildah
all versions
redhat
openshift container platform
4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17
redhat
enterprise linux
8.0, 9.0
redhat
enterprise linux eus
8.8, 9.0, 9.2, 9.4
redhat
enterprise linux for arm 64
8.0_aarch64, 9.0_aarch64
redhat
enterprise linux for arm 64 eus
8.8_aarch64, 9.0_aarch64, 9.2_aarch64, 9.4_aarch64
redhat
enterprise linux for ibm z systems
8.0_s390x, 9.0_s390x
redhat
enterprise linux for ibm z systems eus
8.8_s390x, 9.0_s390x, 9.2_s390x, 9.4_s390x
redhat
enterprise linux for power little endian
8.0_ppc64le, 9.0_ppc64le
redhat
enterprise linux for power little endian eus
8.8_ppc64le, 9.0_ppc64le, 9.2_ppc64le, 9.4_ppc64le
+4 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References