CVE-2025-0756
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-0756 is a critical-severity Resource Injection (CWE-99) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 43% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions prior to 10.2.0.2, including the 9.3.x and 8.3.x branches, contain an improper control of resource identifiers vulnerability (CWE-99). The product fails to restrict JNDI identifiers supplied when platform data sources are created, allowing an upstream input to reference resources outside the intended control sphere.
An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges on the Pentaho server can supply a crafted JNDI name that resolves to arbitrary local or remote resources. Successful exploitation grants the ability to read or modify configuration files and other sensitive data, and can be escalated to remote code execution on the underlying host.
The vendor advisory directs customers to upgrade to version 10.2.0.2 or later, which enforces proper validation of JNDI identifiers during data-source creation.
EPSS for the CVE rose from a low baseline of 0.0066 to a peak of 0.0166, indicating increased exploitation interest after disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-11536
Vulnerability Data
Overview The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the input before it is used as an identifier for a resource that may be outside the intended sphere of control. (CWE-99) Description…
more
Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions before 10.2.0.2, including 9.3.x and 8.3.x, do not restrict JNDI identifiers during the creation of platform data sources. Impact An attacker could gain access to or modify sensitive data or system resources. This could allow access to protected files or directories including configuration files and files containing sensitive information, which can lead to remote code execution by unauthorized users.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.8V1.3.9V1.3.11V9.2.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Directly requires validation of inputs before they are accepted as resource identifiers.
Enforces authorizations on resource access so an injected identifier cannot reach outside the intended sphere.
Enforces information flow rules that block use of untrusted identifiers to reach unauthorized resources.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and sanitization that prevent resource-identifier injection flaws.
Least-privilege access policy and enforcement limits damage from injected resource identifiers even when input validation is absent.
Network segmentation and unauthorized-access controls reduce the blast radius of successful resource injection.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect resource-injection flaws but does not itself implement preventive controls.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and resource-identifier sanitization that directly prevents resource injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls on external identifiers used to access resources.
Secure architecture principles reduce attack surface for resource injection but do not prescribe identifier validation.
Secure coding standards require strict validation and whitelisting of all resource identifiers before use.
Information-access-restriction policies limit which resources can be referenced, indirectly reducing injection impact.