CVE-2025-14534
Memory Safety in Utt 512W Firmware ≤ 1.7.7-171114
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-14534 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Utt 512W Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.9 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 8% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-14534 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the UTT 进取 512W router firmware versions up to 3.1.7.7-171114. The issue resides in the strcpy function within the /goform/formNatStaticMap file of the Endpoint component, triggered by manipulation of the NatBind argument. Classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input), it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8, indicating critical severity.
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation over the network with low complexity, requiring no privileges or user interaction. Unauthenticated attackers can send crafted requests to the affected endpoint, causing a buffer overflow that leads to high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution or denial of service.
Advisories from VulDB and a GitHub issue detail the vulnerability, noting that an exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early regarding disclosure but provided no response, and no patches or mitigations are mentioned in the available references.
Notable context includes the public availability of the exploit, increasing the risk of active exploitation against unpatched devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-202880
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was determined in UTT 进取 512W up to 3.1.7.7-171114. This impacts the function strcpy of the file /goform/formNatStaticMap of the component Endpoint. Executing manipulation of the argument NatBind can lead to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched…
more
remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.