CVE-2025-14535
Memory Safety in Utt 512W Firmware ≤ 1.7.7-171114
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-14535 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Utt 512W Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.9 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 8% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-14535 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the UTT 进取 512W device running firmware versions up to 3.1.7.7-171114. The issue resides in the strcpy function within the /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW file, where manipulation of the 'ssid' argument triggers the overflow. This flaw, classified under CWE-119 and CWE-120, carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating critical severity due to its potential for complete system compromise.
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers with network access, requiring low complexity and no user interaction. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary code execution, potentially granting attackers high-impact control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected device, such as executing malicious code or disrupting network operations.
Advisories from VulDB and a GitHub issue tracker detail the vulnerability but note no vendor response despite early contact, implying no official patches or mitigations are available. Security practitioners should isolate affected devices, monitor for exploitation attempts targeting the /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW endpoint, and consider firmware upgrades if released.
A publicly available exploit exists, increasing the risk of active attacks against unpatched UTT 进取 512W deployments.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-202887
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was identified in UTT 进取 512W up to 3.1.7.7-171114. Affected is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW. The manipulation of the argument ssid leads to buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly…
more
available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.