CVE-2025-15429
Memory Safety in Utt 512W Firmware ≤ 1.7.7-171114
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-15429 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Utt 512W Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-15429 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the UTT 进取 512W firmware version 1.7.7-171114. The issue affects the strcpy function within the /goform/formConfigCliForEngineerOnly file, where manipulation of the addCommand argument triggers the overflow. Classified under CWE-119 and CWE-120, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact.
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers with low privileges over the network, requiring no user interaction. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary code execution, granting high levels of confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise, such as data theft, modification, or denial of service on the affected device.
Advisories from VulDB and related disclosures note that a proof-of-concept exploit is publicly available on GitHub, increasing the risk of active misuse. The vendor was notified early but has not responded or issued patches, leaving no official mitigations; practitioners should isolate affected devices, monitor for suspicious activity on the /goform endpoint, and consider firmware upgrades if released.
Notable context includes the public disclosure of the exploit, which may facilitate widespread attacks on unpatched UTT 进取 512W devices. No evidence of in-the-wild exploitation is reported in available sources.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-0710
Vulnerability Data
A security vulnerability has been detected in UTT 进取 512W 1.7.7-171114. Affected by this vulnerability is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formConfigCliForEngineerOnly. Such manipulation of the argument addCommand leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack…
more
remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.