Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-15230

Memory Safety in Tenda M3 Firmware 1.0.0.13\(4903\)

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
30 December 2025
Modified
24 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0064 48th percentile
Risk Priority 38 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-15230 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda M3 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 48th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-15230 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the Tenda M3 router on firmware version 1.0.0.13(4903). The flaw resides in the formSetVlanPolicy function within the /goform/setVlanPolicyData file, where manipulation of the qvlan_truck_port argument triggers the overflow. It is classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow).

Remote exploitation is possible over the network with low complexity and no user interaction. Per the CVSS v3.1 score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), attackers require only low privileges, such as those of an authenticated user, to achieve high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.

Advisories from VulDB (ctiid.338626, id.338626, submit.725490) document the issue, while a public exploit proof-of-concept is available on GitHub at dwBruijn/CVEs/blob/main/Tenda/setVlanPolicy.md. The Tenda vendor site at tenda.com.cn provides relevant product information for checking firmware updates or patches.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in Tenda M3 1.0.0.13(4903). Affected by this issue is the function formSetVlanPolicy of the file /goform/setVlanPolicyData. Performing a manipulation of the argument qvlan_truck_port results in heap-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The…

more

exploit has been made public and could be used.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-15233Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-15234Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2026-5567Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-15231Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-15253Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-9298Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-9299Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-15232Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-15252Same product: Tenda M3
CVE-2025-8178Same vendor: Tenda

Affected Assets

tenda
m3 firmware
1.0.0.13\(4903\)

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.3.2
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.

Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.

Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.

Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.

ID.RA-08 partial match
prevents

Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.

PR.AT-02 partial match
prevents

Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer operations, directly eliminating CWE-119.

none

Change management ensures controlled deployment of fixes for discovered heap-overflow vulnerabilities.

References