Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-15233 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda M3 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 48th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-15233 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the formSetAdInfoDetails function in the /goform/setAdInfoDetail file of Tenda M3 firmware version 1.0.0.13(4903). The flaw arises from manipulation of arguments such as adName, smsPassword, smsAccount, weixinAccount, weixinName, smsSignature, adRedirectUrl, adCopyRight, smsContent, and adItemUID, as classified under CWE-119 and CWE-122.
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers with low privileges (PR:L), requiring network access and low attack complexity but no user interaction. With a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), successful exploitation can result in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution on the affected device.
VulDB advisories (ctiid.338629, id.338629, submit.725495) document the issue, while a GitHub repository at dwBruijn/CVEs/blob/main/Tenda/setAdInfoDetail.md provides a publicly released exploit. The Tenda vendor site at tenda.com.cn is referenced for further details, though no specific patches are detailed in available sources.
The exploit's public release heightens the risk of real-world attacks against unpatched Tenda M3 devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-205699
Vulnerability Data
A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda M3 1.0.0.13(4903). This issue affects the function formSetAdInfoDetails of the file /goform/setAdInfoDetail. The manipulation of the argument adName/smsPassword/smsAccount/weixinAccount/weixinName/smsSignature/adRedirectUrl/adCopyRight/smsContent/adItemUID results in heap-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit…
more
has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V1.4.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.
Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer operations, directly eliminating CWE-119.
Change management ensures controlled deployment of fixes for discovered heap-overflow vulnerabilities.