Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-15357

Command Injection in Dlink Di-7400G\+ Firmware 19.12.25a1

Published
30 December 2025
Modified
09 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.039 89th percentile
Risk Priority 39 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-15357 is a medium-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Dlink Di-7400G\+ Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 11% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-15357 is a command injection vulnerability affecting the D-Link DI-7400G+ router on firmware version 19.12.25A1. The flaw resides in an unknown function within the file /msp_info.htm?flag=cmd, where manipulation of the cmd argument enables command injection. It is classified under CWE-74 and CWE-77, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L).

The vulnerability is remotely exploitable by attackers possessing low privileges, such as authenticated users with basic access. Exploitation requires network connectivity and low attack complexity but no user interaction. Successful attacks can result in limited impacts, including partial disclosure of sensitive information, modification of data, and denial of some services through arbitrary command execution.

Advisories and references, including VulDB entries (ctiid.338743, id.338743, submit.726376) and the D-Link website, provide further details. A proof-of-concept exploit is publicly available on GitHub at xyh4ck/iot_poc/tree/main/D-Link_DI_7400G%2B_Command_Injection, indicating potential for immediate use by threat actors.

The exploit's public disclosure heightens the risk for exposed D-Link DI-7400G+ devices running the vulnerable firmware.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in D-Link DI-7400G+ 19.12.25A1. This affects an unknown function of the file /msp_info.htm?flag=cmd. The manipulation of the argument cmd results in command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and…

more

could be used.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-9769Same product: Dlink Di-7400G\+
CVE-2025-57105Same product: Dlink Di-7400G\+
CVE-2025-10689Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2025-11100Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2026-1625Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2025-15391Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2026-4205Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2026-8344Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2025-10401Same vendor: Dlink
CVE-2025-11096Same vendor: Dlink

Affected Assets

dlink
di-7400g\+ firmware
19.12.25a1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References