Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-20094

Hummingheads Defense Platform ≤ 3.9.51.0

Published
06 February 2025
Modified
04 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0015 5th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-20094 is a high-severity Shatter (CWE-422) vulnerability in Hummingheads Defense Platform. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Unprotected Windows messaging channel ('Shatter') issue exists in Defense Platform Home Edition Ver.3.9.51.x and earlier. If an attacker sends a specially crafted message to the specific process of the Windows system where the product is running, arbitrary code may be…

more

executed with SYSTEM privilege.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-22894Same product: Hummingheads Defense Platform
CVE-2025-22890Same product: Hummingheads Defense Platform
CVE-2025-23236Same product: Hummingheads Defense Platform
CVE-2025-24483Same product: Hummingheads Defense Platform
CVE-2025-24845Same product: Hummingheads Defense Platform

Affected Assets

hummingheads
defense platform
≤ 3.9.51.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces authorization checks on all logical access paths, which directly requires verifying message sources before allowing privileged actions.

Enforces information flow rules between processes, blocking unauthorized messages from lower-privilege sources to elevated ones.

Requires isolation of security functions so that untrusted message channels cannot reach privileged code paths.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure-development practices require source validation of Windows messages and avoidance of unnecessary elevation.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Least-privilege enforcement directly reduces the elevated-privilege condition required for the shatter attack.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can discover shatter vulnerabilities but does not itself implement the control's broader acceptance criteria.

degrades

Restricting use of privileged utility programs limits the number of elevated processes that could be exploited through unprotected Windows messages.

mitigates

Privileged access rights reduce the attack surface by limiting processes that run elevated and can be targeted via shatter attacks.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and privilege separation that directly prevent shatter-style message injection.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify authenticated IPC and message-source verification to block unauthorized Windows messages.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles require least-privilege design and authenticated inter-process communication, mitigating shatter attacks.

References