Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-24150 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Apple Safari. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 14% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-24150 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) stemming from inadequate handling of files, specifically where copying a URL from Web Inspector can trigger command injection. The issue affects Safari versions prior to 18.3, iOS prior to 18.3, iPadOS prior to 18.3, and macOS Sequoia prior to 15.3. It has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact.
A remote attacker without privileges can exploit this vulnerability by tricking a target user into copying a maliciously crafted URL from Web Inspector, which requires user interaction. Successful exploitation enables command injection, potentially granting the attacker high-impact access to compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected system.
Apple advisories confirm the issue was fixed with improved file handling in Safari 18.3, iOS 18.3, iPadOS 18.3, and macOS Sequoia 15.3. Mitigation involves updating to these patched versions, as detailed in support documents at https://support.apple.com/en-us/122066, https://support.apple.com/en-us/122068, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/122074, along with full disclosure postings at http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jan/13 and http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jan/15.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-3654
Vulnerability Data
A privacy issue was addressed with improved handling of files. This issue is fixed in Safari 18.3, iOS 18.3 and iPadOS 18.3, macOS Sequoia 15.3. Copying a URL from Web Inspector may lead to command injection.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.