Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-24213 is a high-severity Type Confusion (CWE-843) vulnerability in Apple Ipados. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-24213 is a type confusion vulnerability (CWE-843) stemming from improper handling of floats, which could lead to memory corruption. The issue affects multiple Apple platforms and components, including Safari prior to version 18.5, iOS prior to 18.5, iPadOS prior to 18.5 and 17.7.7, macOS Sequoia prior to 15.5, tvOS prior to 18.5, visionOS prior to 2.5, and watchOS prior to 11.5.
The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (High), with local attack vector (AV:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), and required user interaction (UI:R). A local attacker could exploit it to achieve high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H), potentially enabling arbitrary code execution through memory corruption upon successful type confusion.
Apple addressed the issue through improved float handling in the listed fixed versions. Official advisories detailing the patches are available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/122404, https://support.apple.com/en-us/122405, https://support.apple.com/en-us/122716, https://support.apple.com/en-us/122719, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/122720. Security practitioners should prioritize updating affected devices to mitigate exposure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-8974
Vulnerability Data
This issue was addressed with improved handling of floats. This issue is fixed in Safari 18.5, iOS 18.5 and iPadOS 18.5, iPadOS 17.7.7, macOS Sequoia 15.5, tvOS 18.5, visionOS 2.5, watchOS 11.5. A type confusion issue could lead to memory…
more
corruption.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.5.2V3.2.3V15.3.5
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and type-aware analysis) directly finds type-confusion flaws before deployment.
Engineering principles can require use of type-safe languages, static typing, and runtime type checks that structurally avoid allocating one type and accessing another.
Memory-protection controls limit the blast radius when a type-confusion access occurs but do not stop the flaw itself.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-confusion flaws via safe typing, static analysis, and code review while the control itself addresses many additional weaknesses.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect type-confusion vulnerabilities through fuzzing and static analysis.
Secure SDLC mandates type-safe design and review that can catch type-confusion flaws.
Application security requirements can specify strong typing and interface contracts that reduce type confusion.
Secure architecture principles promote type-safe languages and memory-safety mechanisms that mitigate type confusion.
Secure coding standards directly forbid unsafe type casts and require static-analysis checks for type confusion.