CVE-2025-25663
Memory Safety in Tenda Ac8 Firmware 16.03.34.06
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-25663 is a critical-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Tenda Ac8 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-25663 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability affecting Tenda AC8V4 router firmware version V16.03.34.06. The flaw exists in the SUB_0046AC38 function of the /goform/WifiExtraSet file, where manipulation of the wpapsk_crypto argument triggers the overflow. It maps to CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input), and was published on 2025-02-20.
With a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), the vulnerability enables exploitation over the network with low complexity, requiring no authentication or user interaction. Unauthenticated remote attackers can achieve high-impact effects on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, likely leading to arbitrary code execution on the device.
Technical details on the vulnerability, including exploitation specifics, are documented in the advisory at https://github.com/jangfan/my-vuln/blob/main/Tenda/AC8V4/WifiExtraSet.md. No patch or mitigation guidance is specified in the available description.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-4508
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC8V4 V16.03.34.06. Affected is the function SUB_0046AC38 of the file /goform/WifiExtraSet. The manipulation of the argument wpapsk_crypto leads to stack-based buffer overflow.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.