CVE-2025-25664
Memory Safety in Tenda Ac8 Firmware 16.03.34.06
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-25664 is a critical-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Tenda Ac8 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-25664, published on 2025-02-20, is a stack overflow vulnerability affecting the Tenda AC8V4 router firmware version V16.03.34.06. The flaw occurs via the shareSpeed parameter in the sub_49E098 function and is classified under CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input). It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), indicating severe risk.
The vulnerability enables exploitation over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring no privileges (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and unchanged impact scope (S:U). Remote, unauthenticated attackers can trigger the stack overflow to achieve high confidentiality (C:H), integrity (I:H), and availability (A:H) impacts, likely resulting in arbitrary code execution or device compromise.
Mitigation details are available in the referenced advisory at https://github.com/jangfan/my-vuln/blob/main/Tenda/AC8V4/SetIpMacBind.md. No specific patches or vendor guidance are detailed in the provided CVE information.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-4511
Vulnerability Data
Tenda AC8V4 V16.03.34.06 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the shareSpeed parameter in the sub_49E098 function.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.