CVE-2025-26005
Memory Safety in Telesquare Tlr-2005Ksh Firmware 1.1.4
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-26005 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Telesquare Tlr-2005Ksh Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-26005 is an unauthorized stack overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) in Telesquare TLR-2005KSH version 1.1.4. The issue occurs when requesting the admin.cgi parameter with setNtp, allowing exploitation without authentication. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating critical severity due to its potential for severe impacts.
Unauthenticated attackers with network access can exploit this vulnerability remotely with low attack complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation enables high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution, data theft, system modification, or denial of service on the affected device.
Additional technical details, including potential proof-of-concept information, are documented in the referenced advisory at https://github.com/Fan-24/Digging/blob/main/7/1.md. No specific patch or mitigation guidance is outlined in the available CVE information.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-8244
Vulnerability Data
Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 is vulnerable to unauthorized stack overflow vulnerability when requesting admin.cgi parameter with setNtp.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.
Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.