CVE-2025-29462
Memory Safety in Tenda Ac15 Firmware 15.13.07.13
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-29462 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Tenda Ac15 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Tenda AC15 router running firmware version V15.13.07.13. The flaw is located in the webCgiGetUploadFile function, which invokes socketRead to handle incoming HTTP request messages and performs an unbounded copy that overwrites a stack buffer. The issue is tracked as CWE-120 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8.
An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted HTTP request over the network to trigger the overflow. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to corrupt stack memory, leading to remote code execution with full control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the device.
The single available reference is a technical write-up hosted on HackMD; no vendor advisory or firmware patch information is supplied in the published record. The associated EPSS score remains low, with a current value of 0.0067 and a modest peak of 0.0103.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-10038
Vulnerability Data
A buffer overflow vulnerability has been discovered in Tenda Ac15 V15.13.07.13. The vulnerability occurs when the webCgiGetUploadFile function calls the socketRead function to process HTTP request messages, resulting in the overwriting of a buffer on the stack.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.
Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.