Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-32409 is a high-severity Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) vulnerability in Prizmlabs (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 38% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-32409 affects Ratta SuperNote A6 X2 Nomad devices running firmware versions prior to December 2024. The flaw stems from insufficient validation when receiving firmware images over TCP port 60002, combined with directory traversal and flawed concurrency handling that allows an attacker-supplied image signed with debug keys to be written to the device’s update location, enabling remote code execution.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the issue by sending a crafted firmware payload directly to the exposed port. Successful exploitation grants the ability to install arbitrary code with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, rated at CVSS 8.1 with network attack vector and no required privileges or user interaction.
The referenced technical analysis from Prizm Labs describes the rootkit-style attack surface but does not detail vendor-issued patches or configuration mitigations beyond the implicit remediation in builds released after December 2024.
EPSS scores for the vulnerability rose from a low baseline to a recorded peak of 0.0684 (current value 0.0508), indicating emerging exploitation interest after public disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-10059
Vulnerability Data
Ratta SuperNote A6 X2 Nomad before December 2024 allows remote code execution because an arbitrary firmware image (signed with debug keys) can be sent to TCP port 60002, and placed into the correct image-update location as a consequence of both…
more
directory traversal and unintended handling of concurrency.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Explicit validation of path inputs stops .. sequences from ever being interpreted by the file system.
Access enforcement directly blocks unauthorized file reads/writes that result from unresolved .. sequences.
Information-flow rules can be configured to reject traversals that would move data outside an approved directory boundary.
Least privilege reduces the set of reachable files even when a traversal succeeds.
Secure-engineering principles require safe pathname construction and input neutralization before any file operation.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that prevent relative traversal.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis, but does not itself implement the fix.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and path-handling controls that directly prevent relative path traversal.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against path traversal and other injection flaws.
Secure architecture principles include directory isolation and canonicalization, reducing but not eliminating traversal risk.
Secure coding standards require neutralizing path traversal sequences, directly addressing CWE-23.
Information access restriction limits which files can be reached, mitigating impact but not preventing the traversal flaw.