Security Resilience

CVE-2025-34041

RCE

Public PoCRCECommand Injection
Published
24 June 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v4 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.075 94th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-34041 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 6% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

An OS command injection vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-34041 and assigned CWE-78, affects the Chinese-language builds of the Sangfor Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) management platform in versions 3.2.16, 3.2.17, and 3.2.19. The flaw resides in the EDR Manager interface and carries a maximum CVSS score of 10.0, reflecting network-accessible unauthenticated attack vectors that result in complete confidentiality, integrity Availability impacts on both the vulnerable component and its host environment.

Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit the issue by crafting and sending malicious HTTP requests to the management interface, achieving arbitrary operating-system command execution with elevated privileges. The vulnerability is restricted to the Chinese-language EDR builds and does not affect other language variants.

Exploitation evidence was recorded by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-04 UTC, several months prior to the CVE's publication date. The EPSS score has remained flat at a peak and current value of 0.0375 with no material increase. Public advisories and technical details are available from VulnCheck, CNVD, and Sangfor.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the Chinese versions of Sangfor Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) management platform versions 3.2.16, 3.2.17, and 3.2.19. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to construct and send malicious HTTP requests to the EDR Manager…

more

interface, leading to arbitrary command execution with elevated privileges. This flaw only affects the Chinese-language EDR builds. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-04 UTC.

CWE(s)
CWE-78

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1584.008 Network Devices Resource Development
Adversaries may compromise third-party network devices that can be used during targeting.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-72884Shared CWE-78
CVE-2024-8278Shared CWE-78
CVE-2023-47209Shared CWE-78
CVE-2025-59360Shared CWE-78
CVE-2024-2389Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-31196Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-41113Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-53975Shared CWE-78
CVE-2023-25925Shared CWE-78
CVE-2024-47901Shared CWE-78

Affected Assets

—
Chinese
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

AC-6 Least Privilege partial match

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

CM-7 Least Functionality partial match

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
blocks

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
blocks

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References