Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-41646

Kunbus Revpi Status ≤ 2.4.6

Published
06 June 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.45 99th percentile
Risk Priority 90 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-41646 is a critical-severity Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast (CWE-704) vulnerability in Kunbus Revpi Status. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-41646 is an authentication bypass vulnerability in a KUNBUS software package, stemming from incorrect type conversion as classified under CWE-704. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 and permits remote attackers to circumvent authentication controls, resulting in full compromise of the affected device.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the issue over the network with low attack complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation grants complete control of the device, including the ability to read, modify, or disrupt its data and functionality.

Vendor advisories published by KUNBUS provide further details on the affected package and recommended actions; they are available at the referenced PSIRT JSON and product security pages. The associated EPSS score has remained at 0.3384 since disclosure with no material increase observed.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An unauthorized remote attacker can bypass the authentication of the affected software package by misusing an incorrect type conversion. This leads to full compromise of the device

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
T1687 Exploitation for Defense Impairment Defense Impairment
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities in security software, infrastructure, or defensive components to degrade, disable, or otherwise continue to impair their ability to prevent, detect, or respond to malicious activity.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-37746Shared CWE-704
CVE-2024-39589Shared CWE-704
CVE-2023-21651Shared CWE-704
CVE-2025-12781Shared CWE-704
CVE-2025-40540Shared CWE-704
CVE-2024-2606Shared CWE-704
CVE-2025-41648Shared CWE-704
CVE-2025-13720Shared CWE-704
CVE-2026-59871Shared CWE-704
CVE-2026-42576Shared CWE-704

Affected Assets

kunbus
revpi status
≤ 2.4.6

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, unit tests) directly finds incorrect type conversions or casts.

Requiring documented development standards and tools can mandate safe typing, casting rules, and compiler checks that stop the weakness from being introduced.

Security engineering principles can require type-safe design and casting practices that structurally avoid incorrect conversions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-conversion flaws via coding standards, reviews, and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can uncover type-conversion defects before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes type-safety reviews that reduce incorrect casts.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate strong typing and safe casting rules.

degrades

Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe type conversions in design.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly forbid or detect incorrect type casts.

References