CVE-2025-47227
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:NSummary
CVE-2025-47227 is a high-severity Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality (CWE-684) vulnerability in Scriptcase (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, ranked in the top 22% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
In the Production Environment extension of Netmake ScriptCase through version 9.12.006 (23), the administrator password reset mechanism is mishandled such that an unauthenticated user can trigger a bypass simply by issuing both a GET and a POST request to login.php. The flaw is tracked as CVE-2025-47227 with a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 and is associated with CWE-684.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the weakness to seize control of the administrator account and thereby bypass authentication entirely. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to modify or access administrative functions without any prior credentials or user interaction.
Public references, including the Synacktiv advisory and the linked GitHub repository, point to ScriptCase’s official changelog for remediation details; operators should review the changelog and apply any available updates that address the login.php handling. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0343 with no material increase since disclosure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-20102
Vulnerability Data
In the Production Environment extension in Netmake ScriptCase through 9.12.006 (23), the Administrator password reset mechanism is mishandled. Making both a GET and a POST request to login.php.is sufficient. An unauthenticated attacker can then bypass authentication via administrator account takeover.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation activities are performed precisely to discover when delivered functionality fails to match published specifications.
Requiring a documented development process and supporting tools reduces the chance that specified functionality will be implemented incorrectly.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly enforce spec-compliant functionality and testing, while eliminating this weakness fulfills only part of the control's broader monitoring intent.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance validates that implemented functionality conforms to specifications before release.
Secure development life cycle includes requirements and verification activities that directly reduce the risk of delivering functionality that deviates from published specifications.
Explicit application security requirements and acceptance criteria help ensure the delivered software matches its intended specifications.
Change management processes reduce the chance of unintended functional deviations during updates, though they do not directly address initial specification conformance.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
- V-258078 RHEL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-684