Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-5195

Access Control in Gitlab 17.9.0 – 17.10.7

Public PoCAccess Control
Published
12 June 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0026 18th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-5195 is a medium-severity Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) vulnerability in Gitlab Gitlab. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.9 before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. It was possible for authenticated users to access arbitrary compliance frameworks, leading to unauthorized data disclosure.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-5309Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-14594Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-6552Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-1338Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-8770Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-3073Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-11247Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-3074Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-2104Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-13874Same product: Gitlab Gitlab

Affected Assets

gitlab
gitlab
18.0.0 · 17.9.0 — 17.10.7 · 17.9.0 — 17.10.7 · 17.11.0 — 17.11.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces authorization checks so authenticated users cannot retrieve compliance frameworks they are not permitted to access.

prevent

Limits privileges of authenticated users to only the specific compliance frameworks required by their role, reducing the impact of the authorization flaw.

prevent

Enforces information-flow rules that restrict which users or sessions may receive data belonging to arbitrary compliance frameworks.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policy and least privilege directly blocks user-controlled key tampering that bypasses access checks.

PR.IR-01 mostly match
prevents

Logical access controls prevent unauthorized data access that results from missing authorization checks on object references.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect missing authorization checks but does not prevent the weakness in production.

prevents

Information access restriction explicitly enforces that users may only retrieve data they are authorized to see, directly addressing user-controlled key bypass.

prevents

Access control policy directly requires enforcement of authorization rules that prevent unauthorized access via manipulated keys.

prevents

Managing access rights includes ensuring users can only access their own records and not bypass authorization by altering identifiers.

mitigates

Privileged access rights control restricts what data each user may access, mitigating direct object reference attacks.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes authorization design but does not itself implement runtime access checks.

References