CVE-2025-8713
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2025-8713 is a low-severity Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata (CWE-1230) vulnerability in Postgresql (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 3.1 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data from Local System (T1005); ranked at the 13th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and AC-16 (Security and Privacy Attributes) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-24811
Vulnerability Data
PostgreSQL optimizer statistics allow a user to read sampled data within a view that the user cannot access. Separately, statistics allow a user to read sampled data that a row security policy intended to hide. PostgreSQL maintains statistics for tables…
more
by sampling data available in columns; this data is consulted during the query planning process. Prior to this release, a user could craft a leaky operator that bypassed view access control lists (ACLs) and bypassed row security policies in partitioning or table inheritance hierarchies. Reachable statistics data notably included histograms and most-common-values lists. CVE-2017-7484 and CVE-2019-10130 intended to close this class of vulnerability, but this gap remained. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, and 13.22 are affected.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
V3.4.2V12.1.5V13.3.2V14.2.4
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Information flow enforcement can be configured to treat metadata as protected information and block its unauthorized release.
Associating and enforcing security/privacy attributes on objects directly governs what metadata may be exposed.
Requiring security attributes to accompany transmitted data prevents sensitive values from leaking through metadata channels.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Classification helps identify metadata that may need protection, but does not directly limit its exposure.
Labelling can flag sensitive metadata, yet does not enforce technical controls to prevent its disclosure.
Transfer policies can require stripping or protecting metadata, but coverage is indirect.
Access-control rules can be extended to metadata objects, though the control is not metadata-specific.
Data-masking techniques can obscure sensitive metadata values, providing partial mitigation.
DLP solutions can detect and block metadata leakage, yet are not designed solely for this weakness.