CVE-2026-20777
Memory Safety in Libbiosig Project Libbiosig 3.9.2
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-20777 is a high-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Libbiosig Project Libbiosig. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-20777 and published on 2026-03-03, affects the Nicolet WFT parsing functionality in The Biosig Project's libbiosig version 3.9.2 and the master branch at commit db9a9a63. This flaw, classified under CWE-122, carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Processing a specially crafted .wft file triggers the overflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.
Remote attackers require no privileges or user interaction but must craft a file with high complexity to exploit this over a network. Successful exploitation grants high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts, enabling full arbitrary code execution in the context of the affected libbiosig process.
Mitigation details are available in the associated advisories from Talos Intelligence, referenced at https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2026-2362 and https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2026-2362.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-9291
Vulnerability Data
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Nicolet WFT parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.2 and Master Branch (db9a9a63). A specially crafted .wft file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file…
more
to trigger this vulnerability.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.4.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.
Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.
Security engineering principles require use of memory-safe constructs and bounds-checked allocation routines that avoid introducing heap overflows.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability of a heap overflow to execute attacker-controlled code or corrupt adjacent structures.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.
Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect heap overflows before release.
Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that reduce the likelihood of introducing heap overflows.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory APIs that mitigate heap overflows.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safety and input-validation controls that address heap overflows.
Secure coding standards directly prescribe techniques (safe functions, bounds checks) that prevent heap-based buffer overflows.
Change management ensures controlled deployment of fixes for discovered heap-overflow vulnerabilities.