CVE-2026-2118
RCE in Utt 810 Firmware 1.7.4-141218
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-2118 is a high-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Utt 810 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 10% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2118 is a command injection vulnerability affecting UTT HiPER 810 version 1.7.4-141218. The issue resides in the sub_4407D4 function within the /goform/formReleaseConnect file of the rehttpd component. It arises from improper handling of the Isp_Name argument, allowing injected commands, and was published on 2026-02-08. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-74 and CWE-77.
The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). It can be exploited remotely by authenticated attackers possessing high privileges, with low attack complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation enables command injection, resulting in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Advisories referenced in VulDB (ctiid.344693, id.344693, submit.746802) and a GitHub repository (cha0yang1/UTT810CVE) detail the vulnerability, including a proof-of-concept exploit and readme. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. No specific patch or mitigation details are provided in the available references.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-5827
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was determined in UTT HiPER 810 1.7.4-141218. The impacted element is the function sub_4407D4 of the file /goform/formReleaseConnect of the component rehttpd. Executing a manipulation of the argument Isp_Name can lead to command injection. The attack can be…
more
launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.1V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.
Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.
Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.