CVE-2026-2188
RCE in Utt 521G Firmware 3.1.1-190816
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-2188 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Utt 521G Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2188 is an OS command injection vulnerability in UTT 进取 521G version 3.1.1-190816. The flaw affects the function sub_446B18 in the file /goform/formPdbUpConfig, where manipulation of the policyNames argument triggers the injection. It is associated with CWEs-77 and CWE-78 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers possessing high privileges (PR:H). Exploitation requires low attack complexity with no user interaction, potentially granting high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, including arbitrary command execution on the device.
Advisories and related resources include a publicly disclosed exploit proof-of-concept at https://github.com/cha0yang1/UTT521G/blob/main/RCE2.md, which may be utilized for attacks. Further details are available via VulDB at https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.344891, https://vuldb.com/?id.344891, and https://vuldb.com/?submit.749733; these do not specify patches or mitigations in the provided information.
The CVE was published on 2026-02-08, and the exploit disclosure heightens real-world exploitation risk for unpatched UTT 进取 521G devices.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-5762
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was determined in UTT 进取 521G 3.1.1-190816. The impacted element is the function sub_446B18 of the file /goform/formPdbUpConfig. Executing a manipulation of the argument policyNames can lead to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack…
more
remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.
Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.
Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.