CVE-2026-23808
Arubanetworks Arubaos 6.5.4.0 – 8.10.0.21
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:NSummary
CVE-2026-23808 is a medium-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Arubanetworks Arubaos. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-23808, published on 2026-03-04, is a vulnerability in a standardized wireless roaming protocol that allows a malicious actor to install an attacker-controlled Group Temporal Key (GTK) on a client device. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.4 (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N) and maps to CWE-94 (Code Injection). The vulnerability affects client devices using this protocol in wireless networks.
A remote malicious actor with adjacent network access can exploit the issue with low attack complexity, requiring no privileges or user interaction. Successful exploitation enables unauthorized frame injection, bypass of client isolation, interference with cross-client traffic, and compromise of network segmentation, integrity, and confidentiality.
Mitigation details are available in the HPE security advisory at https://support.hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05026en_us&docLocale=en_US.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-9414
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability has been identified in a standardized wireless roaming protocol that could enable a malicious actor to install an attacker-controlled Group Temporal Key (GTK) on a client device. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a remote malicious actor…
more
to perform unauthorized frame injection, bypass client isolation, interfere with cross-client traffic, and compromise network segmentation, integrity, and confidentiality.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.
Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.
Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).
PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.
Controls that restrict unauthorized or malicious code from being introduced via external networks or removable media limit opportunities for an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code.