Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-25687 is a high-severity Race Condition within a Thread (CWE-366) vulnerability in Zscaler Client Connector (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 14th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-77536
Vulnerability Data
A race condition in the ZPA tunnel handler of affected versions of Zscaler Client Connector (ZCC) allows a heap corruption, resulting in a denial of service (client crash) and potentially arbitrary code execution in the context of the ZCC process.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V15.4.2V15.4.3V17.2.6
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can include concurrency and stress testing that finds race conditions after they have been coded.
Requiring documented development standards and tools can mandate use of safe concurrency patterns that avoid introducing races.
Security engineering principles include requirements for synchronization primitives and thread-safe design that stop race conditions from being introduced.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require synchronization primitives and concurrency analysis that prevent intra-thread race conditions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development lifecycle includes concurrency and synchronization practices that reduce race conditions.
Application security requirements can mandate thread-safety and locking controls.
Secure architecture principles address concurrent access and resource synchronization.
Secure coding standards directly require proper synchronization primitives to prevent race conditions.
Security testing can detect race conditions through concurrency and stress testing.