CVE-2026-2954
Ujcms 10.0.2
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-2954 is a medium-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Ujcms Ujcms. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 26th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2954 is an injection vulnerability (CWE-74, CWE-707) in Dromara UJCMS version 10.0.2. The flaw affects the importChanel function within the ImportDataController component, specifically at the endpoint /api/backend/ext/import-data/import-channel. It stems from manipulable arguments driverClassName and url, enabling injection attacks.
An attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) indicates that successful exploitation results in low impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Advisories from VulDB note that a public exploit exists and the vendor was contacted early for disclosure but provided no response. No patches or official mitigations are referenced in the available sources, including the Yuque documentation link.
The exploit's public availability increases the risk for unpatched Dromara UJCMS 10.0.2 deployments, with the vulnerability published on 2026-02-22.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-7552
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was found in Dromara UJCMS 10.0.2. Impacted is the function importChanel of the file /api/backend/ext/import-data/import-channel of the component ImportDataController. Performing a manipulation of the argument driverClassName/url results in injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The…
more
exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 6 hardening rules · 4 OS baselines
V1.3.9V1.2.1V1.2.3V1.2.5
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing can discover missing or incorrect neutralization logic.
SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.
Output filtering enforces neutralization properties on data leaving the system.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards directly require proper neutralization of inputs and outputs, eliminating CWE-707.
Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.
Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.
Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271523 OL 9 must check the GPG signature of locally installed software packages before installation. prevents CWE-707