Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-3690

Openclaw ≤ 2026.2.19

Public PoC
Published
11 April 2026
Modified
27 April 2026
CVSS Score v3 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0067 49th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-3690 is a high-severity Reliance on IP Address for Authentication (CWE-291) vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Trusted Relationship (T1199); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) and IA-8 (Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users)) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

OpenClaw Canvas Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of OpenClaw. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the the authentication function for canvas…

more

endpoints. The issue results from improper implementation of authentication. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-29311.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1199 Trusted Relationship Initial Access
Adversaries may breach or otherwise leverage organizations who have access to intended victims.
T1021 Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may use [Valid Accounts](https://attack.
T1133 External Remote Services Persistence
Adversaries may leverage external-facing remote services to initially access and/or persist within a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-22174Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32064Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-29613Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32896Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-28450Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-28458Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-28446Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32041Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-29606Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-28485Same product: Openclaw Openclaw

Affected Assets

openclaw
openclaw
≤ 2026.2.19

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Requires unique identification and authentication of users rather than permitting unauthenticated or spoofable attributes such as source IP.

Requires unique identification and authentication of non-organizational users, precluding reliance on IP address alone.

AC-17 Remote Access partial match

Mandates documented usage restrictions and configuration requirements for remote access that cannot be satisfied by IP-based authentication.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 full match
prevents

Strong authentication mechanisms directly replace reliance on spoofable IP addresses.

PR.AA-01 mostly match
prevents

Managed identities and credentials supplant weak IP-based authentication decisions.

DE.CM-01 partial match
prevents

Network monitoring can detect misuse of IP authentication but does not prevent the weakness.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Authorization policies and least privilege reduce dependence on network-location assertions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure-authentication control directly addresses the weakness by requiring proper credentials instead of IP address.

prevents

Access-control policy can mandate stronger authentication than IP address alone.

prevents

Identity-management processes should replace IP-based identification with verified identities.

degrades

Authentication-information rules discourage reliance on mutable attributes such as IP addresses.

prevents

Access-rights assignment should be tied to authenticated identities, not network location.

prevents

Privileged-access rules require authenticated users rather than implicit IP trust.

References