Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-37531

Path Traversal in Linuxfoundation Automotive Grade Linux ≤ 17.1.12

Published
01 May 2026
Modified
18 May 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0071 50th percentile
Risk Priority 72 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-37531 is a critical-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Automotive Grade Linux. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked in the top 50% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-25 (Reference Monitor) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-37531 is a Zip Slip path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) combined with a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition (CWE-367) affecting AGL app-framework-main versions through 17.1.12. The issue resides in the widget installation flow, where the is_valid_filename function in wgtpkg-zip.c validates ZIP entry names but only blocks absolute paths, failing to check for dot notation directory traversal sequences like "../". The zread extraction function then uses openat(workdirfd, filename, O_CREAT), which resolves these relative to the working directory and permits writing files anywhere on the filesystem. Critically, in the install_widget function of wgtpkg-install.c, extraction occurs before signature verification via check_all_signatures; if verification fails, the cleanup routine (remove_workdir) only removes files from the temporary working directory, leaving traversed files in place permanently.

The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating it is exploitable remotely by unauthenticated attackers with low complexity and no user interaction required. An attacker can craft a malicious widget ZIP package containing traversal payloads in filenames and deliver it for installation via the app framework. During extraction, files are written to arbitrary locations before any signature checks, enabling full filesystem compromise including high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts such as overwriting critical system files, planting malware, or exfiltrating data.

References include the AGL app-framework-main source repository on Gerrit for potential patches and a GitHub Gist disclosure detailing the vulnerability. No specific mitigation guidance is provided in the available details, so practitioners should review the source code and disclosure for updates or workarounds, such as validating filenames more rigorously or deferring extraction until after signature verification.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

AGL app-framework-main thru 17.1.12 contains a Zip Slip path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) combined with a TOCTOU race condition (CWE-367) in the widget installation flow. The is_valid_filename function in wgtpkg-zip.c validates ZIP entry names but does not check for dot notation…

more

directory traversal sequences it only blocks absolute paths. The zread extraction function uses openat(workdirfd, filename, O_CREAT) which resolves dot notation values relative to the work directory, allowing files to be written anywhere on the filesystem. Critically, in function install_widget in file wgtpkg-install.c, extraction via zread occurs BEFORE signature verification via check_all_signatures. Even if signature verification fails, the error cleanup (remove_workdir) only deletes the temporary work directory files written outside via path traversal persist permanently.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
T1574 Hijack Execution Flow Stealth
Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking the way operating systems run programs.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-27969Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-33211Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-25152Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2024-26150Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-40923Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-29185Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2024-45816Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2025-59352Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2024-39826Shared CWE-22, CWE-367
CVE-2026-41491Same vendor: Linuxfoundation

Affected Assets

linuxfoundation
automotive grade linux
≤ 17.1.12

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2
  • V15.4.2
  • V17.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

A reference monitor that is always invoked and analyzable structurally eliminates the non-atomic check-then-use pattern underlying TOCTOU.

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Process isolation limits the blast radius of a successful TOCTOU exploitation but does not remove the race itself.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly include coding standards and reviews that prevent TOCTOU race conditions.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References